interos.ai Chosen for $919 Million GSA’s SCRIPTS Contract to Deliver AI-Powered Supply Chain Risk Management

Today, interos.ai’s supply chain risk intelligence platform is now available through Carahsoft Technology Corp. on the U.S. General Services Administration’s (GSA) Supply Chain Risk Illumination Professional Tools and Services (SCRIPTS) Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA). This 10-year, $919 million contract vehicle is designed to equip U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Defense (DoD) and Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) with advanced tools to identify, monitor and mitigate supply chain risks in real-time. 

Delivering Mission-Ready Risk Intelligence

“Being selected for GSA’s SCRIPTS BPA is a major milestone that expands our ability to support Federal agencies in today’s volatile risk environment,” said Chris Lee, Chief Revenue Officer at interos.ai. “Global supply chains facing on-going shocks, mean agencies need faster, smarter tools with real-time visibility to stay ahead of emerging disruptions. This agreement gives agencies access to AI-powered insights that strengthens operational continuity and powers forward-looking threat mitigation.” 

With interos.ai, agencies can uncover hidden risks across complex, multi-tier supply chains, gaining the foresight to act before disruptions escalate.  We are providing agencies with a unified, AI-driven capability to gain real-time visibility and actionable intelligence across their supplier ecosystems to safeguard military readiness and protect critical infrastructure. 

A Strategic Partnership to Meet Evolving Threats

Brian O’Donnell, Vice President for Supply Chain Solutions at Carahsoft, added, “With interos.ai’s innovative platform, government agencies are better equipped to proactively manage risks, whether from cyber vulnerabilities, geopolitical shifts or hidden threats deep within global supply chains. Through the SCRIPTS BPA, Carahsoft and our reseller partners are committed to delivering the technology that supports national security and operational readiness over the next decade.” 

Running through March 2035, the SCRIPTS BPA simplifies procurement, making it easier for agencies to adopt next-generation solutions that address supplier risk, cybersecurity challenges and external disruptions, all in one platform. 

This announcement reflects a broader movement: federal agencies are signaling that real-time, AI-driven risk management is no longer optional, it’s essential. As they adapt to an increasingly complex threat landscape, interos.ai is proud to stand at the forefront of this shift, helping government teams move from reactive responses to proactive resilience. 

Learn more about interos.ai’s offerings through Carahsoft and the SCRIPTS BPA here . 

A New Era of Innovation: Eliminating Risk from Every Supply Chain

 We Accept the Challenge: On a Mission to Eliminate Risk from Every Supply Chain 

Supply chains are entangled and complex: the average S&P 500 enterprise has 1,700 direct suppliers in their first three tiers of supply chains, comprised of 1.5 million buyer-supplier relationships each.  

Supply chains operate in an environment of constant risk. In 2024 alone, there were:  

  • 8,500 catastrophic events disrupting operations 
  • 15,000 companies impacted by reported cyber attacks 
  • 20x increase in US restricted entities 

In the Fortune 1000, supply chain risk is typically managed with manual labor, supplier surveys and internal data. This often happens outside the direct daily visibility of the CEO exec team and the board.  

This isn’t just inefficient, it’s not fit for purpose. 

We are challenging this status quo of risk intelligence: 

  • No more manual labor in a spreadsheet 
  • No more over-reliance on supplier survey data  
  • No more internal data in a vacuum 
  • No more clunky, disparate systems that don’t talk to each other 

interos.ai is more than data. We are streamlined enterprise-grade software. 

With more than 1,700 suppliers to the average large enterprise (S&P 500), multiple tiers deep, in an environment of constant risk, we do what manual supply chain risk management can’t: uncover all the risks without delay. 

Don’t Take Our Word For It: Trust the Leaders in Risk Management:  

Leading enterprises depend on interos.ai, including Mastercard, Google, L3Harris and the US Navy. We are embedded into the workflow of the largest Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) providers: Our i-Score® is the industry standard currency for measuring supply chain risk, as used by: ServiceNow, Coupa and SAP Ariba.  

Proof is in the innovation:  

  • Added fresh experienced executive talent 
  • Built applied AI for unparalleled visibility and control with risk trends and industry benchmarking  
  • Launched Regulatory & Market Risk Insights to empower enterprises to stay ahead of sanctions, tariffs and trade shocks with real-time intelligence 
  • Won the 2025 TPRA Excellence Award for Risk Rating and Risk Intelligence Platform 
  • Put customer experience first: award-winning supplier visualization through the nth tier   

When 90% of the $23.5 trillion US real GDP is produced in the commercial sector, the world needs a risk management platform built for commercial success.  

The world needs interos.ai.  

Enterprises can save up to $37 million annually by using interos.ai to react faster to multi-factor risk threats hidden throughout extended global supply chains. 

interos.ai uncovers and ranks supply-chain risks, so organizations can address them before they become CEO-level problems. interos.ai uses AI to surface what matters most, based on millions of real-world scenarios and the world’s most comprehensive database of supply chain risk (230m+ supply chain entities, 11b+ relationships, ‘n’ tiers of depth), allowing you to take action before risks hit the CEO’s desk. 

Innovation at Our Core: Building the Next Generation Predictive Intelligence Platform 

We are doing things differently in a sector that needs visionary innovation. interos.ai is revolutionizing the supply chain risk management lifecycle with AI and building the next generation predictive intelligence platform to proactively drive down risk across six risk factors:  

  • AI-powered software  
  • Fueled by deep industry expertise 
  • Using clean rooms to facilitate deeper insights by 
  • Extracting value from your own first-party data and 
  • Combining with interos.ai’s leading industry data 
  • Giving you the actionable insights you need to drive down risk 
  • Across digital and physical supply chains 

Ready to challenge the status quo of supplier risk management?  

Thousands of Companies Exposed to High Financial Risk Following President Trump’s Tariffs

Authors: Kate Anderson, PhD, Senior Manager, Network Science and Teddy DeWitt, PhD, Lead Computational Social Scientist 

Markets across the globe crashed in response to last week’s tariffs, erasing more than $10 trillion and causing drops not seen since the beginning of COVID. The turmoil continued on Wednesday, with a series of retaliatory tariff announcements.  

While the White House did announce a 90-day delay in country-specific tariffs, with a corresponding market rebound, these swings in the market are disruptive and reflect broader concerns around an uncertain economy.  

However, the impact is not uniform. Some companies are seeing larger swings than others, indicative of additional financial risk. Thanks to interos.ai’s anomalous returns predictive model, we can leverage market data to identify which companies and industries have a greater likelihood of enhanced financial risk in this era of uncertainty and trade barriers. 

A Tumultuous Financial Market: Tariffs and Trade War  

Last week’s reciprocal tariffs executive order introduced a 10% tariff on all US imports, with steeper rates for dozens of countries, including some of the US’s biggest trade partners.  

While the worldwide 10% tariff went into effect on Saturday, April 5th, this was then paused and for the next 90 days as of April 9th. The tariff rate on China went into effect on April 9th.  

The other promised country-specific tariffs are scheduled to start after a 90-day period. These additional tariffs – impacting 86 countries – disproportionately affect some major US trading partners, including China, India, Vietnam, and Taiwan, with projected severe effects on supply chains and global markets. 

The 10% world-wide tariff and “reciprocal tariffs” on other countries add to those already levied by President Trump earlier this year, including an additional 10% duty on imports from China, a 25% tariff on imported cars, 25% on steel, between 10-25% on aluminum, and import tariffs on a variety of Canadian and Mexican goods.   

The new batch of US import tariffs hits several of the country’s largest trading partners, which interos.ai forecasts will have a dramatic effect on supply chains.  

The initial announcements raised the tariffs on Chinese imports by 54%, to a total of over 64%, with updated announcements increasing rates to 125%.  

Chinese goods represent 16% of US imports, including critical parts and raw materials such as rare earth metals. Other major US trading partners were threatened with similarly large tariffs.  

India’s announced tariff rate rose from 2% in 2024 to 26%. The tariff rate in Taiwan—the source of most of the world’s semiconductors—rose from 1% to 32%. While semiconductors are not currently under tariff restrictions, President Trump has implied that they may lose that exemption. Tariffs on Vietnam—a significant exporter of electronics—are going from 4% to a staggering 46%.

These tariffs have triggered retaliatory measures by other countries: 

  • Canada announced a 25% retaliatory tariff. 
  • European Union reacted with tariffs on a wide range of goods commonly imported from the US. 

These numbers are changing daily, fueling uncertainty and market instability. 

Financial Instability: Identifying At-Risk Industries and Companies 

The reaction of the markets to the tariff announcement was immediate and dramatic.  

On April 3rd, the day the tariffs were announced, the markets experienced a drop of 4-6% —  the largest single-day drop since the pandemic.  

This kind of drop in market price suggests that investors are anticipating future financial instability.  

While the markets rebounded after the 90-day stay announcement on Thursday, investors are still extremely nervous, and markets are likely to experience further big swings in the coming months.

As part of interos.ai’s comprehensive machine learning model for financial risk, the anomalous returns model captures unexpected shifts from expected market behavior.  

Markets often reflect the collective knowledge of investors about the financial future of a company. By including daily market returns in our scoring, interos.ai leverages that collective knowledge to predict financial risk, especially important in identifying which companies or industries may be most affected.

interos.ai uses an algorithm to identify anomalies in return data—companies that experience a larger drop than would be expected given current market conditions and historical price volatility. This indicator was inspired by the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) banking crisis, when the stock price of SVB experienced an abnormally large decline months before the actual crisis occurred.  

Looking at the overall market certainly highlights the pessimism of the market.  

However, it disguises an important factorlosses are not uniformly distributed across different parts of the economy.  

While some industries experienced large drops in average returns, others saw no drop at all. The table below shows the interos.ai industries that saw the largest drop in market returns last week. Apparel, Manufacturing, and Retail industries saw the biggest hits, followed by Ship Building, Springs, Furniture Manufacturing, Electronic Components, and Freight and Transportation.  

The picture is still more complex than that.  

interos.ai’s Financial Model Shows Over 1,000 Companies Exposed to Abnormally High Financial Risk from President Trump’s Tariffs 

After all, the entire market crashed on April 3rd, and even healthy companies likely took a hit. In addition, some industries are more volatile than others, meaning that what might be a large drop in market price for a metal manufacturer looks very different from what normal looks like in other industries. Our anomalous returns model identifies companies that saw a disproportionate fall in market returns, relative to declines in the rest of the market and relative to historical volatility 

Context is everything.  

And makes the difference between getting in front of risk or being controlled by the risky fallouts.  While electronics made headlines for seeing a big drop in returns on April 3rd, the data from the anomalous returns model suggests that the drop was not abnormally large.  The electronics market is historically volatile such that we expect returns in that industry to drop with the smallest overall market decline.  

In contrast, metal manufacturing and fossil fuel extraction are extremely stable industries. Seeing a large drop in the market returns for companies in those industries is a huge red flag, even if they are smaller in absolute terms than the drops in electronics.

interos.ai identified over a thousand companies globally that exhibited an abnormally large response to the market shifts.  

These are companies that not only experienced losses, but unexpected losses—losses that are many times larger than would be expected given the overall market decline and are therefore at much greater financial risk. 

Some companies experienced extraordinarily large losses, with the highest of these declines upwards of 50%.  

Unsurprisingly, many of the penalized companies come from countries heavily impacted by the new tariffs, including Canada, Japan, and China. 

Avoiding the Fallout from High Financial Risk 

The uncertainty around the US’s position in the global economy continued this week as some announced tariffs went into effect and others were delayed. 

The global response to the announcements were swift, with retaliatory tariffs levied against US imports and stock markets falling.  

Jamie Dimon, Chaiman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase commented on the risk climate we have entered in his latest letter to shareholders. “The economy is facing considerable turbulence (including geopolitics), with the potential positives of tax reform and deregulation and the potential negatives of tariffs and “trade wars,” ongoing sticky inflation, high fiscal deficits and still rather high asset prices and volatility.” 

During such an unprecedented time, supply chain resilience becomes even more critical. To stay afloat in a tumultuous trade war is to stay abreast of the regulatory shifts and to ensure visibility into your supplier dependencies.  

If a critical supplier is buried in your supply chain and is exposed to abnormally high financial risk, you need to know. And you need to know so you can act before disaster strikes.  Underlying market information can help surface growing financial risks.  

interos.ai will continue tracking those companies and industries exhibiting anomalous returns, providing proactive intelligence for our customers as they weather such dramatic micro-economic fluctuations. 

Supply chain disruptions cost financial services organizations $164 million per year on average. 

See your total financial supply chain and act fast on insights:

The End of Globalization…Again? Creative Destruction and the Global Order

Author: Dr. Andrea Little Limbago, SVP, Applied AI  

The April 2nd tariffs are the latest culprit blamed for the death of the interdependent economic system that began following World War II.  

Much has been written about the immediate impact of these tariffs but there has been much less attention on how these tariffs fit into the broader, macro-trends reshaping the global economy.  

The immediate ‘fog of uncertainty’ disrupting financial markets and supply chains is part of a deeper restructuring that is underway, one which is driven by a generational technological revolution, and the resulting geopolitical competition shaping this new order.  

How We Got Here 

Following World War II, global leaders gathered in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire and created three global institutions to shape the world order: the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (which evolved into the World Trade Organization).  

The goal was to create an interdependent economic system to promote post-war recovery and international cooperation. As a result, global trade in 2023 was 134 times greater than in the early 1960s, and has shaped what many call the modern era of globalization. 

Since then, there have been persistent rumors of the death of globalization. In the early 1970s, President Richard Nixon ended the Bretton Woods monetary regime and its fixed exchange rate system. 

 While it ended one system, many believe this ushered in the current era of globalization.  

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the end of the Cold War opened up new markets that were cut off from decades of global trade, leading some to argue this is when globalization truly went global.  

At that same time, the rise of preferential trade agreements (PTAs), such as NAFTA and the EU, sparked concern over the demise of free trade. The 2008 financial crisis, 2018 US-China trade war, and 2020 global pandemic additionally instigated claims of the death of globalization. While extremely different circumstances and rationale, at the macro-level, these conversations are mirror those today on the impact of President Trump’s tariffs.  

In short, globalization has experienced a series of disruptions, expansions, and restructuring over the decades. What arguably makes this time different is the digital and technological revolution, and the tariffs more so reflecting one of many realpolitik-focused responses to today’s geo-strategic realities. 

A New Era of Creative Destruction 

In the late 1930s and 1940s, Joseph Schumpeter coined the term ‘creative destruction’ to refer to the evolutionary nature of capitalism, wherein technological advances make obsolete previous products and processes, leading to significant reallocation and labor market disruptions. He experienced real-world examples of technological disruptions, perhaps most notably Ford’s assembly line as well as the military revolution during World Wars I and II.  

Earlier this year, the World Economic Forum argued that today’s ongoing technology convergence is paving the way for the Fifth Industrial Revolution. At the same time, the WEF noted that the technological revolution requires a reskilling revolution, with 22% of today’s jobs already changing due to AI and big data, while at least 60% will require upskilling in the coming years. 

 This is on par with the job destruction detailed by Schumpeter almost a century ago and may even understate the foundational shift underway thanks to great power politics. As Chinese President Xi Jinping  noted at the National Science and Technology Awards Conference 2024, “The scientific and technological revolution and the great power game are intertwined.” 

Today, the tariff debate is nestled within the broader context of global decoupling along geopolitical fault lines.  

Last year, an IMF study highlighted the shift toward ally-shoring or friendshoring – reorienting supply chains toward allied partners. While nearshoring has garnered more attention, they note that trade distances have grown due to a prioritized focus on like-minded, allied countries. A similar study noted a 7% decline in trade between non-allied countries. Together, the forces of creative destruction and geopolitical competition are creating unchartered territory. 

For decades, just-in-time, lowest cost, hyperspecialized supply chains drove globalization with minimal thought to geopolitics.  Today, geopolitics is playing an outsized role in reshaping the global economy, with recent tariffs simply one of many factors indicative of this transformation. In the United States, the CHIPS Act and Inflation Reduction Act preceded President Trump, and prioritized domestic manufacturing.  

In addition, well before President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’, China initiated the Made in China 2025 policy, aimed at decreasing reliance on foreign goods and manufacturers. Over the last decade, export controls and industrial policy have further promoted trusted technology networks, sparking a supply chain bifurcation of technologies from drones to 5G to AI.  

Just like the elevation of tariffs, the DeepSeek moment likely will accelerate this decoupling and spark additional AI-focused export controls or bans aimed to promote national technology champions. 

 Tariffs & Global Transformation 

The global economy continues to evolve, with this current era a significant inflection point driven by creative destruction, and the competition to ‘win’ the digital revolution. The tariffs – regardless of the eventual scale and scope– are a symptom of the ongoing global transformation, at times referred to as glocalization. Governments race to adapt to creative destruction and the wave of uncertainty as new policies, regulations, and realpolitik upend existing processes and norms. 

While reciprocal tariffs could be an equalizer, placing US tariffs on par with higher tariffs imposed on US goods, concern grows that they could lead to subsequent beggar-thy-neighbor trade policies that have historically hurt all involved.  

Regardless, they are in opposition to global free trade and tightly entangled with geopolitics (on allies and adversaries alike), leading to a range of knock-on effects. For instance, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul recently referenced years of literature on the pacifying effects of free trade on global conflict, noting, “The more we trade…the less we fight.” Significant academic literature has been devoted to the pacifying effects of free trade.  

In many ways, tariffs are a symptom of the broader global transformation underway. It is essential to assess their immediate impact, but companies seeking greater resilience must view them in the context of a broader transformation to the global economy.  

This transformation is fueled by the technological revolution, and the geopolitical race to establish the governance and institutional structures guiding it.  

We are in the beginning phases of creative destruction, one that is upending all forms of market risk and stability, with tariffs the latest disruption, but certainly not the last transforming the international order. 

To stay ahead of sanctions, tariffs and trade shocks head to our latest launch:   

Introducing Regulatory & Market Risk Insights

Author: Mackenzie Clark, Lead Computational Social Scientist

Persistent Market Turbulence and the interos.ai Solution

In February, interos.ai shared insights about the potential impact of the proposed 25% duty on all imports into the United States from Mexico and Canada. While this action was partially delayed in March, the end of the pause is rapidly approaching with an April 2nd  deadline for the enactment of these tariffs to the United States’ top trading partners.

While tariffs against Mexican and Canadian imports were delayed, others were still implemented. An additional 10% duty on imports from China was enacted, bringing the total duties levied against Chinese imports to 20%. China quickly retaliated with import tariffs of their own. Similarly, the US implemented a 25% duty on all steel and aluminum imports from any country, which officially took effect March 12th. In response, both Canada and the European Union announced new tariffs on key US exports.

Amid the whiplash being induced by an impending trade war, the ongoing drumbeat of export controls provides an additional regulatory risk that is reshaping global supply chains. Sanctions on companies continue to increase year-over-year. Export restrictions, such as those implemented by China that restrict the supply of key minerals to the US, are also a common tool in the arsenal of countries seeking to gain or retain their competitive advantage. Other regulations such as the EU Deforestation Regulation or those related to unethical labor practices—Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act and Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act—also require organizations to monitor and investigate potential regulatory exposures in their extended supply chain.

These rapid-fire developments in the global market highlight that there is no sign of slowing when it comes to new tariffs and the evolution of the regulatory risk landscape writ large. Now more than ever, organizations require a comprehensive monitoring solution that can rapidly alert them to changes that may impact their direct and extended supply chain.

Today, interos.ai is proud to announce the release of our Regulatory & Market Risk Insights. This solution is designed to surface additional context and key data points that enable proactive, strategic decision-making when navigating an increasingly turbulent, complex global market. Organizations can leverage these insights and identify which suppliers are exposed to tariffs, whether they are exporting high-risk products, or if they are situated in a country or industry with greater regulatory risk posture.

Steel and Aluminum  Under Fire

For instance, on March 12th, US steel and aluminum tariffs went into effect, leaving no country untouched from these across-the-board tariffs. Analysis from interos.ai shows that the 25% import tariff on steel and aluminum goods may have an expansive impact to companies in the United States, with over 400,000 companies purchasing some form of steel or aluminum product. Among these companies, the most exposed industries include Architectural, Engineering, and Design Services, Consumer Goods, Industrial Equipment Manufacturing and Sales, and Building and Civil Engineering Construction. However, it seems that no industry will remain entirely untouched by this action.

Using our Regulatory & Market Risk Insights, organizations can easily identify companies that may be exposed to limited supply or increased costs because of newly announced tariffs:

Reulatory and Market Insights
Using interos.ai’s new Regulatory & Market Risk Insights companies can navigate the daily changes to regulatory policy, including exposure to trade was and tariffs.

Cars and Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors, Oh My!

In anticipation of additional import tariffs, interos.ai also analyzed what the impact of President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on vehicles and vehicle parts and other proposed tariffs on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and lumber would look like for companies in the U.S. 

Much like the steel and aluminum import duties, the impact of the proposed 25% duty on these products and commodities would be expansive:

Again, by leveraging interos.ai’s Regulatory & Market Risk Insights, organizations can easily identify companies that may be exposed to these proposed tariffs:

Table view of suppliers at risk of tariffs

Beyond Tariffs

While tariffs and trade wars are a hot topic, companies around the world are still responsible for navigating other aspects of the regulatory landscape.

Over the past several months, interos.ai has highlighted the impact of regulations, sanctions, and industry trends that have the potential to shake up supply chains. This has included coverage and impact analyses of the EU Deforestation Regulation, additions to the UFLPA Entity List, and industry-wide risks related to insecure artificial intelligence technologies.

With the release of our Regulatory & Market Risk Insights, the issues covered by these analyses will all be readily available for organizations to leverage in their risk management processes.

Assessing the Impact to Your Organization

It is unclear how much new trade barriers and regulations—and the resulting changes to costs and supply—will impact companies in the United States and around the world. Amid so much uncertainty in the supply chain, it is challenging to understand what the next best action is for companies and consumers alike.

From higher prices to operational disruptions to economic shocks, interos.ai is closely monitoring the situation and how it is impacting supply chains and the global economy, enabling companies to build resilience during a time of significant supply chain disruptions.

To learn more about Regulatory & Market Risk Insights reach out to an expert here.